Easy runs: why running slow makes you faster
Running slow feels like it shouldn't make you faster, but it does. The pattern behind most strong endurance athletes is about 80 percent easy, and most of us run our easy days too hard. Here's why slow works, and how to keep easy actually easy.
The quick answer
Most runners run their easy days too hard, and it quietly holds them back. The pattern seen in the best endurance athletes is roughly 80 percent of running easy, below the first breathing threshold, and a smaller slice genuinely hard, with little time in the vague middle. Running slow lets you run more, recover better, and arrive at your hard sessions ready to actually go hard. [1,2]
"Easy" has a physiological definition, not just a vibe. It's running below your first ventilatory or lactate threshold: the effort where you can still hold a conversation in full sentences and your breathing stays comfortable. Cross above it and you're no longer doing the thing easy runs are for. [1,2]
The 80/20 pattern
When researchers tracked how elite endurance athletes actually distribute their training, a consistent split showed up: around 80 percent of sessions easy (below that first threshold) and about 20 percent hard, across sports from running to rowing to skiing. [1,2] It's a descriptive finding, what successful athletes do, not a formula handed down from on high, but it's strikingly consistent.
There are a few ways to slice intensity. A polarised distribution stacks lots of easy work and a real dose of hard work with little in between. A pyramidal one has the most volume easy, less at threshold, least flat-out. A threshold-focused one parks a lot of work in the moderate middle. Elites tend to live in the polarised or pyramidal worlds and shift between them across a season. [3,4]
Why hard-easy beats medium-everything
Here's the trap most of us fall into. Left to our own devices, our "easy" runs drift up into a moderate effort that's too hard to be restful but too easy to be a strong stimulus, the so-called black hole or moderate-intensity rut. [2,4] You accumulate fatigue without the upside of either end. The elite pattern deliberately avoids that middle, keeping easy days truly easy so the hard days can be truly hard.
When this was put to the test, it held up. In a trial of well-trained endurance athletes, a polarised programme produced the biggest gains in VO2 peak and performance compared with threshold, high-intensity or high-volume approaches; the threshold-heavy group improved least. [3] The honest caveat: a 2024 meta-analysis found polarised training's edge is real but modest, clearest in shorter blocks and in already-trained athletes, and similar to other distributions for several performance measures. [5] So it's a strong default, not the only way.
What easy running builds
Slow running isn't junk miles. A big base of easy volume develops the aerobic machinery (the capillaries and mitochondria, improved fat use) that lets you hold a pace with less effort. [2] It also builds what physiologists now call durability: how well your efficiency and thresholds hold up deep into a long run, when fatigue would otherwise erode them. [6] That quality, built largely through accumulated easy volume, is part of why marathoners don't fall apart at 32 km.
Crucially, easy runs are cheap. They carry low stress, so they let you stack up the total volume that drives adaptation while saving your recovery for the handful of hard sessions that need it. [2] Run everything moderately hard and you can't run as much, and you blunt the hard days too.
How to keep easy actually easy
- Use the talk test. If you can't speak in full sentences, you're going too fast. It maps well to staying under that first threshold. [2]
- Be wary of heart-rate zones alone. They're a useful guide, but cardiac drift, heat, fatigue and big individual differences mean fixed percentages can mislabel your effort. Treat them as a cross-check, not gospel. [2]
- Let the pace feel almost too slow. That's usually the sign you've got it right.
A note for everyday runners
Most of the strongest evidence comes from trained and elite athletes, so don't take the exact 80/20 as a law for everyone. [4,5] In fact, one study of recreational runners found a more threshold-focused plan delivered similar gains to a polarised one while taking less weekly time. [7] If you're time-limited, some quality in the middle isn't wasted. The universal lesson is narrower and safer: don't let your easy days quietly become medium days ;)
The takeaway
- Easy means below your first threshold - conversational, comfortable breathing. [1,2]
- Elites run roughly 80/20 easy-to-hard, polarised or pyramidal, avoiding the moderate middle. [1,2,4]
- Polarised training tests well, with a real but modest edge, mainly in trained athletes. [3,5]
- Easy volume builds the aerobic base and durability, at low recovery cost. [2,6]
- Keep easy easy with the talk test; don't trust heart-rate zones blindly. [2]
- Recreational runners have more leeway - the key is simply not running easy days too hard. [7]
Slow down on the slow days. It feels counterintuitive, but it's how you get to run more and race faster :)
How's it going for you?
Be honest: are your easy runs actually easy? Try the talk test this week and tell us how it went in the community chat, then put it into practice on a Sunday social run, where easy is the whole point.
- 1. Seiler S, Kjerland GO. Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an "optimal" distribution? Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2006;16(1):49-56.
- 2. Seiler S. What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2010;5(3):276-291.
- 3. Stoggl T, Sperlich B. Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training. Frontiers in Physiology. 2014;5:33.
- 4. Stoggl TL, Sperlich B. The training intensity distribution among well-trained and elite endurance athletes. Frontiers in Physiology. 2015;6:295.
- 5. Silva Oliveira P, Boppre G, Fonseca H. Comparison of polarized versus other types of endurance training intensity distribution on athletes' endurance performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Medicine. 2024;54(8):2071-2095.
- 6. Maunder E, Seiler S, Mildenhall MJ, Kilding AE, Plews DJ. The importance of durability in the physiological profiling of endurance athletes. Sports Medicine. 2021;51(8):1619-1628.
- 7. Festa L, Tarperi C, Skroce K, La Torre A, Schena F. Effects of different training intensity distribution in recreational runners. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. 2020;1:70.
Frequently asked questions
How slow should an easy run be?+
What is 80/20 running?+
Are easy runs just junk miles?+
Can I just rely on heart-rate zones to run easy?+
Does 80/20 apply to beginners and recreational runners?+
Reading about running is good. Running with people is better.
See this week's sessions →
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to share your experience.
Log in to comment